Click Here to Return to "Move That Bridge"

 

 

Please send your opinions to movethatbridge@cox.net - constructive discussions will be posted here.

 

=============================================================================

HOMEOWNER OPINIONS:

 

=============================================================================

In the meeting on May 9th, the Mayor said that the anticipated increase in tax revenues would be important for Tulsa.  I would think that just the opposite is true.  If you look at the corner of 151st and Yale, you will find several commercial projects which will probably be completed when the bridge is.  I believe that Bixby's goal is to pull south Tulsa retail dollars to Bixby and not send Bixby's tax dollars to Tulsa.

=======================================================================================

 

Greetings,

Your efforts thus far have amplified the voice of those private citizens in this area.  We are among those who will be effected by this private development as it infringes on our rights and environment. 

We fear for the peace and successful coexistence of the Bald Eagles which are nesting along the river in the targeted construction area.  These birds are a great value to this community and the nation.  To wait until their current brood has fledged and then invade their nesting area is not acceptable.  Bald Eagles are known to repeatedly return to a successful breeding site year after year.  The disruption caused by construction of this toll bridge will be devastating to these breeding pairs of our nations majestic symbol.

The estimated traffic volumes will turn the Yale Corridor into a nightmare for those of us who build our homes and raise families here, while the city will struggles for years to catch up with more of our tax dollars.  Safety will be a vanishing community asset and congestion will be as common as our morning coffee.  

While the development of this toll bridge may be a foregone conclusion, its exact location should be negotiable.   We should continue to work hard for a more appropriate and less destructive location.

We applaud your efforts to date yet we acknowledge there is still much to do.  We also know these efforts are not expense free and we will be glad to help with incurred finances where appropriate.

======================================================

In all the things I have read and heard, I have never heard how this bridge is going to benefit south Tulsa residents in its present route.  I have read that it will benefit Bixby and Bixby schools and how it will benefit Tulsa County (that simply means that both will receive revenue from the bridge tolls) and how it will relieve traffic on Memorial, but nothing as to how it will benefit the south Yale Avenue neighborhoods in terms of traffic or revenue.  No matter how you view it, Yale and Sheridan south of the Creek Turnpike, whether they are two lanes or five lanes, are residential thoroughfares and should not support commercial or heavy commuter traffic.

 

======================================================

 It was interesting that no representative from either the County or  Bixby attended the April 26th meeting. I believe that if we polled the SW corner of the city we would find a preponderance of opinion that this area has continually been shortchanged ("ignored") by the City. There is no reason to rush this bridge project. In the words of "Tiny" Thompson, a land developer, "development comes first and then the infrastructure". Let the south side of the river develop, and then let's meet on the bridge again. A homeowner and a QT executive in Hampton Oaks said that they as a corporation have followed the bridge proposal for a number of years and have not found any economic justification for it at this location or any nearby location. 151st Street has been in existence for a number of years, and it continues along with the Creek through Broken Arrow as two of the most beautiful but least traveled roadways in this part of the Tulsa metroplex. Our neighbor would only surmise that there is more to the bridge story (not to the benefit of South Tulsa) than any of the politicos will elaborate. Also, there is plenty of cheap commercial space throughout Tulsa that is readily available at this time! My original thought was move the bridge, but as weeks go on perhaps this should change to stop the bridge.

 

==================================================================

There was an editorial on the bridge on Yale in the Tulsa World.  I'm not speaking for everyone, but I believe not all people in South Tulsa along the Yale corridor are necessarily against the bridge.  Some have concerns they would like addressed such as traffic continuing north on Yale rather than up Delaware.  While 71st street and Hwy 169 were major undertakings, they have always been state or federal highway’s – these were designed to alleviate local traffic congestion and not create it.  It’s hard to use that logic for Yale unless there is a state highway of which some are not aware running up Yale from south of the river.  As for economic development, most of us are for it, not against it; just as long as it is done with everyone’s needs in mind and not just those who stand to profit from the almighty dollar (read Bixby, Bixby schools and Tulsa County).  There are lots of signs in the 151st and Yale Place area regarding new commercial development.  That’s great and I’m not against taking city taxes for Tulsa down to Bixby.  Let’s just make sure everyone’s concerns are heard and that we do what we can to respond to them.  I believe it’s called a “middle ground”. 

The historical analogy Ken used is logical only to the truth about the need for bridges.  Many bridges are now in place to serve Tulsa and the surrounding communities.  Bixby is tied with Jenks and Hwy 75 which is tied with the turnpike which is tied with ….. do we really need a bridge so that Bixby traffic can get into south Tulsa easier and vice versa?  If so, why shouldn’t the traffic be routed to Delaware and up to the turnpike rather than onto Yale northbound on a residential road and by a grade school?

=================================================================

Several years ago people on Sheridan fought an entrance to the Creek Turnpike and now they regret it as they have to go to Yale or Memorial to access it. It has been a little inconvenient to some but most of us now recognize what an asset it has been to the area.
I think a bridge will also be an asset to the area but it is planned for the wrong place.
 
The bridge should be placed at dead man's curve at Riverside and 121st street. It would make for a better access to the Creek Turnpike and remove a very bad situation. Efforts should be made to help our officials recognize how they can convert a dangerous curve into a real asset to the area.
 
I live in Hunters' Pointe and favor a bridge, and will use it, but the location should be
changed to be safer for all of us.

=========================================================

 

 

Return to "Move That Bridge"